Before the
French Revolution, the meaning of the word “revolution” was a kind of “mechanical
movement” like that of the Galilean Mechanics.
After the
French Revolution, this word got the social and political meaning that everyone
knows.
In the last
decade of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st
century, children, teens and young people learned a new way of communication
among them with and into the internet, mainly by social networks. That
communication worked like a “neuronal network”. Each person made a new kind of
exercise with fingers and muscles, with a new language that operated new “neuronal
networks” inside each brain. At same time, all those brains, and fingers and
screenings were connected by this new language.
At some point,
all of those things started to work as a “big brain”, an “earth brain”, a “noosphere”.
As any brain, this new “collective brain” activated “social muscles” to produce
“movements”. So, through all the world appeared a new kind of “revolution”,
maybe a “mycro-revolution”...
To understand
“mycro-revolution” we need to find new tools…
Experts of politics and sociology try to apply old foundations to study new phenomena that
are configured in new and unknown paradigms.
We cannot
apply the word “revolution” to explain some social phenomena that happened
before French Revolution, because that sense of the word did not exist. It
could be an anachronism. Maybe we could say that “it seemed like a revolution”, but it was not quite the same thing. In that way, the “Scientific Revolution” of the 17th century
was invented after that new meaning of the word. Was it a true revolution?
Maybe the
meaning of the word revolution used in the last two centuries is changing, or
going to be more complex, adding new meanings…
In
after-postmodern era we must apply new concepts and tools to read the signals of “mycro-revolutions”
coming from the noosphere of the earth brain…
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário