Thomas Kuhn
wrote his most famous work entitled “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” based
on the idea of “scientific paradigm”. In the beginning his “paradigm” was only restricted
to the field of Hard Science. Step by step it became a tool applied to any
other fields, and it even became a kind of a “fashion word” used in several
circumstances. Anyway, as we have a succession of scientific paradigms in the History
of Science, we could think if there is also a “succession of paradigmatic
crisis” that we see or read through contextual concepts. Maybe, the Human History
is a succession of crisis... or this is a vision of an after-postmodern point of view.
quarta-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2018
domingo, 14 de outubro de 2018
After-postmodern Narratives 3
In After-postmodern
times we live in a paradoxical situation in terms of the deep meaning of Narrative
and its value for the West Society.
As the author
Siva Vaidhyanathan explains in the book “Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects
Us and Undermines Democracy”. Nowadays people do not care too much to read books
and explore its deep meanings. Everybody is very busy with distractions and
shallow things in Facebook, even with good things that in the beginning the founders
of it thought that was happening.
Maybe we can
add to that reflection that some explanation of the situation is “the archetype
of the shadow”, in a Jungian concept. The shadow of the human being is in every
human activity. Any activity. Even if we think that it is the purest activity
ever. The purest faith, the purest religion, the purest brotherhood, and so on.
The human
being must learn how to deal with “the shadow”. Ancient traditions, religious
or of other nature, have some keys to deal with the shadow. Even Narratives are
a way to deal with the shadow. It is a very ancient way.
In After-postmodern
times, some fields learnt to use Narratives to get a deeper knowledge and to
deal with the shadow, as, for example, the Narrative Medicine.
Maybe Facebook
must learn to deal with the shadow, or the users of Facebook. Or maybe people
can have some time to read books or deeper narratives. Facebook is not good or
bad. It depends on what use we make of it.
sábado, 29 de setembro de 2018
After-Postmodern Narratives 2
In 1966
Robert Scholes and Robert Kellogg published the book “The Nature of Narrative”.
It was something that emerged in the zeitgeist
of the sixties, in postmodern times, when new perspectives appeared together
with ideas of “deconstruction” of any concept, mainly the old ones. The last
two decades of the 20th century saw a victory of the pragmatism and
objectivity over creation and subjectivity. As history has a kind of
intertwined ways, the narrative studies continued. In the 21st
century started a transition to a new period: a shift to after-postmodern
times. The narrative became something visible to different fields of study and
practice. So, this is the time of Narrative.
sábado, 22 de setembro de 2018
After-Postmodern Narratives
In Postmodern
Period, in the second half of the 20th Century, some scholars started
to think and write about “narrative”. At that days, each field of study was
constrained to stay inside it’s own limits, although some interdisciplinary
movements begun. Narrative was object of interest of some people. But in After-Postmodern
current time, “narrative” became a kind of “interdisciplinary tool”, helping to
understand different sides of human being.
segunda-feira, 23 de julho de 2018
After-postmodern Watch
Watchmaking
was a very interesting activity for centuries. It was a special kind of art and
a technical ability.
The now old
watch worked with the “fingers energy”.
The postmodern watch became something that needed
a “battery”.
In human
progress and evolution, many times we lose something to get something.
The change
from fingers to battery was progress by one side, but a continuous expense for
battery production by other side.
At the same
time, we lost the tic tac sound and that old contact with the watchmaker.
In
after-postmodern times it does not seem that the old watch will make a comeback.
At same
time we have other “watches”, computerized watches, mobile watches…
Maybe even
the time changed, not just the times…
We live in
transitional times, and we are still learning to deal with a new time in new
times…
quinta-feira, 19 de julho de 2018
After-postmodern Rescue
The Thai Rescue can be a sign, a symbol, an example of
a new kind of “globalization”.
In the end of the 20th Century, the end of
postmodern era, the word “globalization” acquired an ambiguous meaning, some
ambiguous hermeneutics.
It was understood as something “not so good” when used
in the economic sense.
Nowadays we have “new globalizations”: in the media,
in the web, and even in human gestures.
It seems that the after-postmodern globalization is
becoming a “humanized” globalization…
sexta-feira, 1 de junho de 2018
After-postmodern and Peace – Part 3
Some
anthropological allegations say that the cultural or even biological evolution,
as in epigenetics, occurred more by collaboration than by confrontation among
human groups. We could ask why this kind of thing could still be present in Mankind.
Why this is not only a characteristic of prehistorical times? Maybe there are
some human conditions that linger, although the technological and scientific
progress, not only the impulse to fight but also the needing to aggregate.
segunda-feira, 28 de maio de 2018
After-postmodern and Peace - Part 2
One era starts
in the era that comes before. The Middle Ages started in the Antiquity. The
Modern Era started in the Middle Ages. And so on...
The
after-postmodern has roots in postmodern movements and thoughts.
The idea of
cooperation to be so or more important than competition and struggle started in
the transition of 19th and 20th centuries with the Russian thinker Kropotkin,
but acquired argument and strength in the last decades of postmodern era, with
some thinkers as Stephen Jay Gould.
sábado, 26 de maio de 2018
After-postmodern and Peace
The after-postmodern conditions lead to Peace, is what seems
to someone that looks to postmodern and after-postmodern times. We can think it
is a kind of utopy, or dream, but Peace is not something that is definitive and
closed. Peace is something under construction all time. But modern times and
post-modern times were times of confrontation. Even the anthropology thinking
explained Evolution by confrontation at modern and postmodern times. Nowadays the
cooperation is more importante than the confrontation. So the anthropology
understands too, about the cultural Evolution of Mankind.
sábado, 17 de março de 2018
The “End of Normal” and the After-postmodern era
When James K.
Galbreith wrote about “the end of normal” he was not talking about some kinds
of “normal” that we can find in several discussions, mainly in Humanities. We
can see, for example, in the book of the French physician and philosopher Georges
Canguilhem, “On The Normal and the Pathological”, a discussion about the concept
of “normal” under biological conditions and studies of the constrution of
medical knowledge. In a general way, what is “normal” in one culture, can have
a diferent meaning in other culture, and so on.
The “end of normal”
for Galbreith is the end of the paradigm that says that the world economy can
grow on and on, under a traditional concept of progress. Now we have to put in
this equation the factor “resource” and “sustainability”. In postmodern times,
this was a kind of dream, although the environmental movement was already present.
So, the pragmatism of industrial,technical,etc development need to change in After-postmodern era. Maybe it is even a new kind of pragmatism dictated by the necessity of Mankind’s
survival.
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)